False advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
she probably really fat from what i been reading. and i mean really dude? u gone sue kfc for 20 million over 2$ worth of chicken. all i got to say is she wild
The Health shown isnt the highest but the fact they sued for a missed count of food products ordered can be replaced or given the amount more needed, its not serious matter that causes injury and can't obviously win a court case, which honestly i feel this person may have other things going on that they just got bored or need the money.
I feel like she could've simply bought some extra pieces of chicken instead of blowing the situation out of proportion. Now KFC could be in dept of 20 million dollars for something as small as false advertisement, which everyone does.
I think that her reason to sue is pointless. I don't think that she would win and why is she suing for so much money when the bucket cost 20 dollars. She was being over dramatic and she should've just asked for a refund.
The fact that they sued for something as simple as chicken is completely immature. It was unnecessary and could have been handled in a different manner. In my opinion, they were probably money hungry and were just looking for a quick come up.
Maaaaaaaan, I would sue too. If i wanted to buy a few pieces of chicken, I would of asked for it. There is no way you're gonna tell me that it's okay to show me a bucket full of chicken and tell me this is what I'm getting for the price you're selling it for and then hand me 4 pieces of baby meat for that same price, it's very heartbreaking.
I think her reason to sue is pointless. She is suing $20 million over a bucket that costed only $20. There were other ways she could have handled this like ask for a refund. She blew this way out of proportion.
According to Fox5, "A Hudson Valley woman is finger lickin’ mad at Kentucky Fried Chicken, claiming its understuffed buckets are for the birds. Anna Wurtzburger, of Hopewell Junction, says she bought a $20 bucket of chicken from KFC over the summer and was disappointed to find it looked much different than what’s in the chain’s ads. “I came home and said, ‘Where’s the chicken?’ I thought I was going to have a couple of meals,” she told The Post. “They say it feeds the whole family … They’re showing a bucket that’s overflowing with chicken,” the 64-year-old widow griped. “You get half a bucket! That’s false advertising, and it doesn’t feed the whole family. They’re small pieces!” This is such a great idea! I'm going to sue KFC next!
I think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC and they could have gave her a free bowl of "overflowing" chicken.
You don't have permission to access "http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/10/24/woman-sues-kfc-for-20-million-over-false-advertising/" on this server. Reference #18.afdf4e17.1477572886.51f6b9c
You don't have permission to access "http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/10/24/woman-sues-kfc-for-20-million-over-false-advertising/" on this server. Reference #18.afdf4e17.1477573073.5206901
she really doesn't know that sueing someone over chicken that really doesn't look what it shows on a commercial shows that shes in it for the money and do we have a picture for this chicken look. she might have just dropped the chicken and maybe asked for a refund and never got it and someone is going to have to take that chicken some bad luck for her. the chicken might look different but think did it taste the same or did it give you something. she really must be trying to hit it big but if you don't know KFC has money and what does that mean more lawyers meaning that the person who sued will only gain lost time.
Anna Wurtzburger, of Hopewell Junction, says she bought a $20 bucket of chicken from KFC over the summer and was disappointed to find it looked much different than what’s in the chain’s ads.
I would also do the same. I would sue them because they do have false advertisement. They even fried a rat before. KFC is highly disgusting. I wouldn't recommend anyone to eat from there.
I don't think that this would be a reason to sue a company for 20 Million US Dollars. Some people are just waiting to sue a company to get rich, so I don't think at all that this advertising was false in any way.
You don't have permission to access "http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/10/24/woman-sues-kfc-for-20-million-over-false-advertising/" on this server. Reference #18.afdf4e17.1477577452.536b02
False advertising is an issue when it comes to the quality of the product like how healthy the product is but being upset over a simple mistake as miscounting is not a good reason to sue KFC.
I think this lady is doing absolutely too much. This case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. This is not a valid reason to sue.
she is being ridiculous for trying to sue for so much money. she probably doesn't have a problem with the amount of chicken but she just found a way to sue KFC for some money cause shes broke. but if she really did have a problem with it she should have just asked for a refund max that she deserves is $25
I would also do the same. I would sue them because they do have false advertisement. They even fried a rat before. KFC is highly disgusting. I wouldn't recommend anyone to eat from there.
I think that her reason to sue is pointless. I don't think that she would win and why is she suing for so much money when the bucket cost 20 dollars. She was being over dramatic and she should've just asked for a refund.
I would sue because of false advertisement, Its only right you can't just let them get away with something like that. so yess it was the rigt thing to do.
I think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC and they could have gave her a free bowl of "overflowing" chicken.
False advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
False advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
i mean yes, it was false advertisement. but she could simply just ask for a refund and not return to the establishment ever again. but on the other hand, if she can sue and get a lot of money from it, then hey! why not!
The link to the article does not work. But considering the link name and the title of the blog, it most likely is not a reason to sue KFC. There are many companies who false advertise their food on television. The food would always look better on TV rather than in real life.
False advertising is an issue when it comes to the quality of the product like how healthy the product is but being upset over a simple mistake as miscounting is not a good reason to sue KFC.
False advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
I would also do the same. I would sue them because they do have false advertisement. They even fried a rat before. KFC is highly disgusting. I wouldn't recommend anyone to eat from there.
WELL OF COURSE ITS NOT GONNA LOOK LIKE THE AD. ITS LIKE SAYING A MCDONALDS BURGER LOOKS LIKE THE COMMERCIAL. THIS LADY SHOULD BE MAKING BILLIONS IF SHE TALK ABOUT FAST FOOD ADS BEING FALSE.
I don't think that this would be a reason to sue a company for 20 Million US Dollars. Some people are just waiting to sue a company to get rich, so I don't think at all that this advertising was false in any way.
The Health shown isnt the highest but the fact they sued for a missed count of food products ordered can be replaced or given the amount more needed, its not serious matter that causes injury and can't obviously win a court case, which honestly i feel this person may have other things going on that they just got bored or need the money.
I feel as though this is a valid reason to sue. If you feel like its not how it was advertised then by all means go ahead. Because false advertisement is a problem .
First of all Mc'donalds does the exact same thing (false Advertising!) and they don't get sued. So why is this Woman picking on KFC! they do the exact same thing! not that still not a reason to sue the fast-food restaraunt!
False advertising is KFC fault.she is customer so that is why she would sues to KFC.but i don't think so because sometime people did false for their advantage.and that problem should not go sue by somebody.
i agree that false advertising is a problem but at the same who is the women to sue KfC. No one told her to go and eat at KFC there is amillion places to eat in the world so why chose kFC
I'm sorry, but i gotta roast you. You suing a company for 20million for like a $10 thing of food. Companies false advertise all the time. Just like how youtubers use clickbait . Maybe it was just that store that didnt give you all your chicken. There is also something called a RECEIPT!!! Take yo food back .
I feel like this isnt a reason to sue. Some people are just waiting to sue a company to get rich, so I don't think at all that this advertising was false in.
Its not reasonable because its $25 worth of chicken and its mad unnecessary to be that extra if it wasn't full she should have got more chicken or got a refund. 2016 is so extra its turning into one big episode of family guy
I think that her decision to sue over a $20 bucket of chicken is unreasonable. I think that she wasted her money on paying for lawyers to claim her case that isn't going to fund as much as she paid just to sue. I think she should've took it up to KFC and made it a complaint. She over exaggerated and should've checked her food before she left so she could've exchanged or returned.
I think she can go somewhere else to get a bucket that feeds her family instead of causing troubles. No she shouldn't sue KFC for their false advertisements .
I think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC.
I think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC.
I think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC.
False advertising is an issue when it comes to the quality of the product like how healthy the product is but being upset over a simple mistake as miscounting is not a good reason to sue KFC
I do not think she should have sued KFC because it was pointless, if she sued them for false advertising then that mean every restaurant or store is getting sued for the same reason. When you open a bag of chips its mostly air and a little bit of chips , would that be false advertising to? . The lady hungry behind should have just went back and got her money back or told them to put some more food in the bucket.
well first off, shes eating at KFC so clearly she needs the money. second, shes just wasting her own time and money because she wants to file a lawsuit. if she wanted an extra piece of chicken so bad, she simply could have reported the problem to management. but instead, she decided to sue a multi million dollar company over miscounted chicken which is pathetic.
I think that her reason to sue is pointless. I don't think that she would win and why is she suing for so much money when the bucket cost 20 dollars. She was being over dramatic and she should've just asked for a refund.
False advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
ReplyDeleteshe probably really fat from what i been reading. and i mean really dude? u gone sue kfc for 20 million over 2$ worth of chicken. all i got to say is she wild
ReplyDeleteThe Health shown isnt the highest but the fact they sued for a missed count of food products ordered can be replaced or given the amount more needed, its not serious matter that causes injury and can't obviously win a court case, which honestly i feel this person may have other things going on that they just got bored or need the money.
ReplyDeleteno it is not a reasonable reason. if anything its better to eat less fried foods at the age of 64.
ReplyDeleteI feel like this isnt a reason to sue. They just wanted the money.
ReplyDeleteNo not really i mean your always going to run into problems like that but it does not mean you should sue the company its just childish.
ReplyDeleteI feel like she could've simply bought some extra pieces of chicken instead of blowing the situation out of proportion. Now KFC could be in dept of 20 million dollars for something as small as false advertisement, which everyone does.
ReplyDeleteI think that her reason to sue is pointless. I don't think that she would win and why is she suing for so much money when the bucket cost 20 dollars. She was being over dramatic and she should've just asked for a refund.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that they sued for something as simple as chicken is completely immature. It was unnecessary and could have been handled in a different manner. In my opinion, they were probably money hungry and were just looking for a quick come up.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNo, there's no reason to sue. It may need attention brought to it, but the bucket was 20 dollars. It'd not that serious.
ReplyDeleteMaaaaaaaan, I would sue too. If i wanted to buy a few pieces of chicken, I would of asked for it. There is no way you're gonna tell me that it's okay to show me a bucket full of chicken and tell me this is what I'm getting for the price you're selling it for and then hand me 4 pieces of baby meat for that same price, it's very heartbreaking.
ReplyDeleteI think her reason to sue is pointless. She is suing $20 million over a bucket that costed only $20. There were other ways she could have handled this like ask for a refund. She blew this way out of proportion.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Fox5, "A Hudson Valley woman is finger lickin’ mad at Kentucky Fried Chicken, claiming its understuffed buckets are for the birds. Anna Wurtzburger, of Hopewell Junction, says she bought a $20 bucket of chicken from KFC over the summer and was disappointed to find it looked much different than what’s in the chain’s ads.
ReplyDelete“I came home and said, ‘Where’s the chicken?’ I thought I was going to have a couple of meals,” she told The Post.
“They say it feeds the whole family … They’re showing a bucket that’s overflowing with chicken,” the 64-year-old widow griped. “You get half a bucket! That’s false advertising, and it doesn’t feed the whole family. They’re small pieces!” This is such a great idea! I'm going to sue KFC next!
Her reason to sue is so pointless. False advertising happens very often and for her to think she is going to get that much chicken is absurd.
ReplyDeleteThis is not as reasonable reason to sue. The lady is just trying to get money.
ReplyDeleteI think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC and they could have gave her a free bowl of "overflowing" chicken.
ReplyDeleteIt says
ReplyDeleteAccess Denied
You don't have permission to access "http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/10/24/woman-sues-kfc-for-20-million-over-false-advertising/" on this server.
Reference #18.afdf4e17.1477572886.51f6b9c
this is not reasonable she wants money shes not gonna get
ReplyDeleteit states the following:
ReplyDeleteAccess Denied
You don't have permission to access "http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/10/24/woman-sues-kfc-for-20-million-over-false-advertising/" on this server.
Reference #18.afdf4e17.1477573073.5206901
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteshe really doesn't know that sueing someone over chicken that really doesn't look what it shows on a commercial shows that shes in it for the money and do we have a picture for this chicken look. she might have just dropped the chicken and maybe asked for a refund and never got it and someone is going to have to take that chicken some bad luck for her.
ReplyDeletethe chicken might look different but think did it taste the same or did it give you something. she really must be trying to hit it big but if you don't know KFC has money and what does that mean more lawyers meaning that the person who sued will only gain lost time.
Anna Wurtzburger, of Hopewell Junction, says she bought a $20 bucket of chicken from KFC over the summer and was disappointed to find it looked much different than what’s in the chain’s ads.
ReplyDeleteThe reason to sue is not reasonable at all. This is actually really stupid.
ReplyDeleteI would also do the same. I would sue them because they do have false advertisement. They even fried a rat before. KFC is highly disgusting. I wouldn't recommend anyone to eat from there.
ReplyDeleteIt isnt that serious to sue because they are under filling their chicken buckets. The government shouldnt take this serious at all in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteI don't think that this would be a reason to sue a company for 20 Million US Dollars. Some people are just waiting to sue a company to get rich, so I don't think at all that this advertising was false in any way.
ReplyDeleteCouldn't blog because it say
ReplyDeleteAccess Denied
You don't have permission to access "http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2016/10/24/woman-sues-kfc-for-20-million-over-false-advertising/" on this server.
Reference #18.afdf4e17.1477577452.536b02
False advertising is an issue when it comes to the quality of the product like how healthy the product is but being upset over a simple mistake as miscounting is not a good reason to sue KFC.
ReplyDeletethis is not reasonable to sue them
ReplyDeleteThis is not a valid reason to sue.
ReplyDeleteI think this lady is doing absolutely too much. This case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. This is not a valid reason to sue.
ReplyDeleteshe is being ridiculous for trying to sue for so much money. she probably doesn't have a problem with the amount of chicken but she just found a way to sue KFC for some money cause shes broke. but if she really did have a problem with it she should have just asked for a refund max that she deserves is $25
ReplyDeleteI would also do the same. I would sue them because they do have false advertisement. They even fried a rat before. KFC is highly disgusting. I wouldn't recommend anyone to eat from there.
ReplyDeleteI think that her reason to sue is pointless. I don't think that she would win and why is she suing for so much money when the bucket cost 20 dollars. She was being over dramatic and she should've just asked for a refund.
ReplyDeleteI would sue because of false advertisement, Its only right you can't just let them get away with something like that. so yess it was the rigt thing to do.
ReplyDeleteI think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC and they could have gave her a free bowl of "overflowing" chicken.
ReplyDeleteFalse advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
ReplyDeleteFalse advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
ReplyDeletei mean yes, it was false advertisement. but she could simply just ask for a refund and not return to the establishment ever again. but on the other hand, if she can sue and get a lot of money from it, then hey! why not!
ReplyDeleteNo, there's no reason to sue. It may need attention brought to it, but the bucket was 20 dollars. It'd not that serious.
ReplyDeletethis y i dont eat kfc
ReplyDeletei mean like i would be mad and try to sue them to
ReplyDeleteher excuse for being mad is reasonable but the suing part is doing too much
ReplyDeleteI can't access the article but chances are this lawsuit isn't reasonable.
ReplyDeletethe problem maybe be the simple fact that they maybe lied about bringing that product back out and it never came back out
ReplyDeleteThis is not as reasonable reason to sue. The lady is just trying to get money.
ReplyDeletethat is not a reason to sue at all she should have checked her food before she left and took it back
ReplyDeleteThe link to the article does not work. But considering the link name and the title of the blog, it most likely is not a reason to sue KFC. There are many companies who false advertise their food on television. The food would always look better on TV rather than in real life.
ReplyDeleteFalse advertising is an issue when it comes to the quality of the product like how healthy the product is but being upset over a simple mistake as miscounting is not a good reason to sue KFC.
ReplyDeleteFalse advertising is a problem when it comes it displaying a product as being healthy or lowfat when it is actually not, but not getting all of your chicken and then attempting to sue the company for forgetting a piece of chicken seems like an incredibly poor reason to sue a company.
ReplyDeleteI would also do the same. I would sue them because they do have false advertisement. They even fried a rat before. KFC is highly disgusting. I wouldn't recommend anyone to eat from there.
ReplyDeletei dont even need to click on the article. the name is enough. KFC SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe link is not working.
ReplyDeleteWELL OF COURSE ITS NOT GONNA LOOK LIKE THE AD. ITS LIKE SAYING A MCDONALDS BURGER LOOKS LIKE THE COMMERCIAL. THIS LADY SHOULD BE MAKING BILLIONS IF SHE TALK ABOUT FAST FOOD ADS BEING FALSE.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI don't think that this would be a reason to sue a company for 20 Million US Dollars. Some people are just waiting to sue a company to get rich, so I don't think at all that this advertising was false in any way.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThe Health shown isnt the highest but the fact they sued for a missed count of food products ordered can be replaced or given the amount more needed, its not serious matter that causes injury and can't obviously win a court case, which honestly i feel this person may have other things going on that they just got bored or need the money.
ReplyDeleteI feel as though this is a valid reason to sue. If you feel like its not how it was advertised then by all means go ahead. Because false advertisement is a problem .
ReplyDeleteFirst of all Mc'donalds does the exact same thing (false Advertising!) and they don't get sued. So why is this Woman picking on KFC! they do the exact same thing! not that still not a reason to sue the fast-food restaraunt!
ReplyDeletei think this is not a reason to sue especially for 20 million. I think she just wanted money. she was probably willing to do anything so she did that.
ReplyDeleteFalse advertising is KFC fault.she is customer so that is why she would sues to KFC.but i don't think so because sometime people did false for their advantage.and that problem should not go sue by somebody.
ReplyDeletei agree that false advertising is a problem but at the same who is the women to sue KfC. No one told her to go and eat at KFC there is amillion places to eat in the world so why chose kFC
ReplyDeleteCORRECTION MY BAD! SOMEONE DID SUE M'CDONALDS!!!
ReplyDeleteI'm sorry, but i gotta roast you. You suing a company for 20million for like a $10 thing of food. Companies false advertise all the time. Just like how youtubers use clickbait . Maybe it was just that store that didnt give you all your chicken. There is also something called a RECEIPT!!! Take yo food back .
ReplyDeleteFALSE ADVERTISING IS ILLEGAL AND A LOT OF COMPANIES DO IT AND I WANT MY MONEY BACK. THAT LADY HAD ALL RIGHTS TO SUE KFC.
ReplyDeleteI feel like this isnt a reason to sue. Some people are just waiting to sue a company to get rich, so I don't think at all that this advertising was false in.
ReplyDeleteIts not reasonable because its $25 worth of chicken and its mad unnecessary to be that extra if it wasn't full she should have got more chicken or got a refund. 2016 is so extra its turning into one big episode of family guy
ReplyDeleteI think that her decision to sue over a $20 bucket of chicken is unreasonable. I think that she wasted her money on paying for lawyers to claim her case that isn't going to fund as much as she paid just to sue. I think she should've took it up to KFC and made it a complaint. She over exaggerated and should've checked her food before she left so she could've exchanged or returned.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that they sued for something as simple as chicken is completely immature.
ReplyDeleteyou have no place to tell her what's immature. You dont know how hungry she was.
Deletei dont the she will get 20 million for something so minor.
ReplyDeleteI think she can go somewhere else to get a bucket that feeds her family instead of causing troubles. No she shouldn't sue KFC for their false advertisements .
ReplyDeleteHer reason to sue is so pointless. False advertising happens very often and for her to think she is going to get that much chicken is absurd.
ReplyDeletethis is not reasonable to sue them
ReplyDeleteI think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC.
ReplyDeleteI think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC.
ReplyDeleteI think this lady is doing absolutely too much. this case is not that serious. she just want to try to get some money and five minutes of fame. if she wanted a bowl of chicken she could have easily went to management of KFC.
ReplyDeleteFalse advertising is an issue when it comes to the quality of the product like how healthy the product is but being upset over a simple mistake as miscounting is not a good reason to sue KFC
ReplyDeleteI do not think she should have sued KFC because it was pointless, if she sued them for false advertising then that mean every restaurant or store is getting sued for the same reason. When you open a bag of chips its mostly air and a little bit of chips , would that be false advertising to? . The lady hungry behind should have just went back and got her money back or told them to put some more food in the bucket.
ReplyDeleteI think she is using her right.
ReplyDeletewell first off, shes eating at KFC so clearly she needs the money. second, shes just wasting her own time and money because she wants to file a lawsuit. if she wanted an extra piece of chicken so bad, she simply could have reported the problem to management. but instead, she decided to sue a multi million dollar company over miscounted chicken which is pathetic.
ReplyDeleteI think that her reason to sue is pointless. I don't think that she would win and why is she suing for so much money when the bucket cost 20 dollars. She was being over dramatic and she should've just asked for a refund.
ReplyDelete